Sponsored Links
Daniel Roth at St. Sulpice, Paris – Improvisation « Sortie »
Daniel Roth, Organist Titulaire of the Grandes Orgues of St. Sulpice, improvises on this instrument a « Sortie » upon conclusion of a Sunday mass. Recorded by Tony Valillo 7 February 1999. FROM www.stsulpice.com. NOT TO BE COPIED WITHOUT PERMISSION.
Daniel Roth at St. Sulpice, Paris – Guilmant Andante
Daniel Roth, Organist Titulaire of the Grandes Orgues of St. Sulpice, performs on this instrument Alexandre Guilmant’s « Andante con moto, op. 16 dedié a A. Cavaillé-Coll » during the Communion of a Sunday mass. Recorded by Tony Valillo 7 February 1999. FROM www.stsulpice.com. NOT TO BE COPIED WITHOUT PERMISSION.
Dans la même rubrique:
Je recherche fournisseurs de produits cosmétique à Paris,?
paris mode converted2
Annonce du salon du vintage Paris 9&10 février 2008/Direct8
Fashiontv | ON AURA TOUT VU FW PARIS HAUTE COUTURE | fashiontv - FTV.com
Estheticienne pour femme enceinte sur Paris à Domicile
Fashion week Paris 2011-2012 Exit Lanvin , Rynshu and Paul Smith.m4v
Termes de recherche:
- daniel roth guilmant
- Sortie - A. Guilmant
- communion/St Sulpice
- Organman52
- daniel roth saint sulpice
- daniel roth organiste
- pieces dedie a cavaille-coll
Yes, it’s FINALLY back in print after languishing for over 40 years.
At 0:18, Aw no way, that’s the Liber Usualis! This guy is a SERIOUS Catholic musician on top of being a world-class organist. The overwhelming vast majority of Catholic organists in the US don’t even know what that is. Maybe [hopefully] things are different in France.
Liber Usualis?
It is an old copy of the book of chants for the yearly Catholic mass cycle — something that was more commonly used during the days of the Latin masses (and coming back into fashion). M. Roth frequently refers to this book for the chant melodies.
What is that book Daniel has on the stand, the one you zoom in on?
@Ntalikeris666 guilmant contributed less than nothing toward the evolution of musical style. Therefore, I ask, how can you bring the master composers Bach and Buxtehude into this discussion? You obviously don’t understand a number of key issues regarding style. The music world could not have done without Bach or Buxtehude, but guilmant would never be missed. He was an empty shell.
@Ntalikeris666 guilmant contributed less than nothing toward the evolution of musical style. Therefore, I ask, how can you bring the master composers Bach and Buxtehude into this discussion? You obviously don’t understand a number of key issues regarding style. The music world could not have done without Bach or Buxtehude, but guilmant would never be missed. He was an empty shell.
@organman52
We should not comfuse influences with copying.
Also, don’t forget that even Bach and many other Baroque or not composers « stole » partially at least fragments or ideas from other pieces.
Comparing Bach and Buxtehude with Guilmant is impossible. They are two completely different things. By the way, no offence, but Organman52 you have to accept other opinions as well. You have to right to believe whatever you want but this does not change that others have different opinions
Though we should not comfuse influencial characteristics with copying.
Also, don’t forget that even Bach and many other Baroque or not composers « stole » partially at least fragments or ideas from other pieces.
Comparing Bach and Buxtehude with Guilmant is impossible. They are two completely different things. By the way, no offence, but Organman52 you have to accept other opinions as well. You have to right to believe whatever you want but this does not change that others have different opinions
Though we should not comfuse influencial characteristics with copying.
Also, don’t forget that even Bach and many other Baroque or not composers « stole » partially at least fragments or ideas from other pieces.
Comparing Bach and Buxtehude with Guilmant is impossible. They are two completely different things. By the way, no offence, but Organman52 you have to accept other opinions as well. You have to right to believe whatever you want but this does not change that others have different opinions.
Though we should not comfuse influencial characteristics with copying.
Also, don’t forget that even Bach and many other Baroque or not composers « stole » partially at least fragments or ideas from other pieces.
Comparing Bach and Buxtehude with Guilmant is impossible. They are two completely different things. By the way, no offence, but Organman52 you have to accept other opinions as well. You have to right to believe whatever you want but this does not change that others have different opinions.
@organman52
Though we should not comfuse influencial characteristics, with copying.
Also, don’t forget that even Bach and many other Baroque or not composers « stole » partially at least fragments or ideas from other pieces.
Obviously Guilmant is good enough for Daniel Roth and good enough for me. I think Guilmant wrote from the heart and that is all a composer can do.
Watching his fingering is such an education for me. The Master player or Organist!
In your opinion, what exactly makes this ‘excellent’?
What’s that for a rubbish, you’re talking?
Guilmant was more based on classic style and harmony instead of the current style. Though, it’s excellent music?!
Remember that prior to Cesar Franck, we he the genius (!) of Lefebvre-Wely as the greatest French composer of his era…
Right on, codeman. The ‘music’ of guilmant is completely empty. I don’t even use his crap for preludes, postludes, etc. Why do that, when there is all that great Bach, Buxtehude, etc.? The worst problem, though, is that his ‘music’ is regarded as legitimate, albeit by a bunch of ignoramuses, simply because it was printed on paper, bound and published. Glad to know you.
Exactly. Guilmant does not fit among these other composers of his era. As for music of the Romantic movement, the music of Guilmant is nothing like Dvorak, Saint-Saens, Brahms, Liszt, Franck. Likewise each of these composers has huge variety from each other and in their own pieces! Why play Guilmant if you can play the works of these superior composers? This Guilmant works fine as filler in a church service like this, but other than that it’s pretty dry music and lacking dynamics.
Wonderfully played, their is no equal to Daniel Roth. He is a professional organist par excellent!